Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

U.S., U.S. Postal Service v. Cen-Card agency/c.c.a.c., Rigatuso (Santo), A/K/A Harris (Bob), Rigatuso (Diana), Sam-Diana Productions, Inc., u.s.credit Corporation of America, Inc., U.S. Credit Corp., Inc., Inc. Incorporated, C.L. Inc. Credit Line, Inc., Forever Gold, Nadell Corp., Gold Card 2500 Inc., Santogold, Inc., H.F. Inc., Harris Family, Inc., Credit Card Authorization Center Inc., C.C.A.C. Inc., Cestronics Products Inc., Fertimer-Bancock, Inc., Melany Aires

961 F.2d 1569

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1992-04-20
Topic
capital-markets-and-corporate-governance

961 F.2d 1569 U.S., U.S. Postal Service v. Cen-Card Agency/C.C.A.C., Rigatuso (Santo), a/k/a Harris (Bob), Rigatuso (Diana), Sam-Diana Productions, Inc., U.S.Credit Corporation of America, Inc., U.S. Credit Corp., Inc., Inc. Incorporated, C.L.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed U.S., U.S. Postal Service v. Cen-Card agency/c.c.a.c., Rigatuso (Santo), A/K/A Harris (Bob), Rigatuso (Diana), Sam-Diana Productions, Inc., u.s.credit Corporation of America, Inc., U.S. Credit Corp., Inc., Inc. Incorporated, C.L. Inc. Credit Line, Inc., Forever Gold, Nadell Corp., Gold Card 2500 Inc., Santogold, Inc., H.F. Inc., Harris Family, Inc., Credit Card Authorization Center Inc., C.C.A.C. Inc., Cestronics Products Inc., Fertimer-Bancock, Inc., Melany Aires. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

961 F.2d 1569

U.S., U.S. Postal Service
v.
Cen-Card Agency/C.C.A.C., Rigatuso (Santo), a/k/a Harris
(Bob), Rigatuso (Diana), Sam-Diana Productions, Inc.,
U.S.Credit Corporation of America, Inc., U.S. Credit Corp.,
Inc., Inc. Incorporated, C.L. Inc. Credit Line, Inc.,
Forever Gold, Nadell Corp., Gold Card 2500 Inc., SantoGold,
Inc., H.F. Inc., Harris Family, Inc., Credit Card
Authorization Center Inc., C.C.A.C. Inc., Cestronics
Products Inc., Fertimer-Bancock, Inc., Melany Aires

NO. 91-5676

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Apr 20, 1992

1

Appeal From: D.N.J.

2

AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART.