Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Mathnay (Harvey Ernest)

United States v. Mathnay (Harvey Ernest), 956 F.2d 1168 (9th Cir. 1992)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1992-03-11
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that Aronowicz “might 4 conceivably support a promissory estoppel claim” even though the plaintiffs were not third 5 party beneficiaries
  • “Once the [proponent] meets this burden [under F.R.E. 901], the probative force of the evidence is an issue for the jury.”
  • discussion of Treasury Department Orders, including Nos. 120 and 150-2

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Mathnay (Harvey Ernest). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
82 opinions

956 F.2d 1168

U.S.
v.
Mathnay (Harvey Ernest)

NO. 91-30197

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Mar 11, 1992

1

Appeal From: D.Or.

2

AFFIRMED.