Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Alfredo Maglinao v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
Alfredo Maglinao v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 955 F.2d 48 (9th Cir. 1992)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1992-02-19
- Topic
- general
955 F.2d 48 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alfredo MAGLINAO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70248. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Alfredo Maglinao v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Alfredo MAGLINAO, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 91-70248.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 13, 1992.*
Decided Feb. 19, 1992.
Before CANBY, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
The petition for review is denied. See Toquero v. INS, No. 90-70439, slip op. 995, 999 (9th Cir. Jan. 31, 1992).
PETITION DENIED.