Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Yellorday v. Rogers
945 F.2d 399
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1991-10-04
- Topic
- bankruptcy
945 F.2d 399 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Rick Lee YELLORDAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W.P. ROGERS, Regional Administrator, Buckingham, Ms. Brown, Unknown, Named Mail Room Clerk, Michael A.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Yellorday v. Rogers. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Rick Lee YELLORDAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W.P. ROGERS, Regional Administrator, Buckingham, Ms. Brown,
Unknown, Named Mail Room Clerk, Michael A. Shupe, David K.
Smith, Virginia Department of Corrections, Commonwealth of
Virginia, Director, of State Treasury, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-6789.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 1, 1991.
Decided Oct. 4, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-90-1704-N)
Rick Lee Yellorday, appellant pro se.
William Rundahl Coleman, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Rick Lee Yellorday appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yellorday v. Rogers, CA-90-1704-N (E.D.Va. Feb. 22, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.