Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

McDaniel v. Mehfoud

McDaniel v. Mehfoud, 927 F.2d 596 (4th Cir. 1991)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1991-02-26
Topic
litigation

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that employee was not falsely imprisoned where he feared losing his job but was not threatened with force and could have walked out of store without having to pass through a locked door or other physical barrier

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed McDaniel v. Mehfoud. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
50 opinions

927 F.2d 596

McDaniel (Mattie S.), Thornton (Frank, Sr.), McMillian
(Carl), Creighton (Sam), Scott (Charles), Justis (Francis),
Stevens (Reginald), Harris (Helen), Archer (C.), Lindsey
(Sanada), Sears (Sadie), Goodall (David, Sr.), Harris
(Elliot), Melvin (Robert, Jr.), McNeil (John, Sr.), Anderson
(Alonzo), Bullock (Walter), Clayton (Leamon, Jr.), Henrico
Cnty. Civic League, Montezuma Oak-Hill Civic Assoc., Henrico
Political Task Force
v.
Mehfoud (Anthony P.), Glover (Richard W.),

NO. 90-3061

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

FEB 26, 1991

Appeal From: E.D.Va., 702 F.Supp. 588

1

DISMISSED.