Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In re Blankenship
In re Blankenship, 871 F.2d 1087 (6th Cir. 1989)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-03-24
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- stating this court has no jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from an order denying leave to appeal or, from orders transferring venue
- stating this court has no jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from an order denying leave to appeal or, from orders transferring venue (citations omitted); Dalton v. United States, 733 F.2d 710, 714 (10th Cir. 1984
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Blankenship. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
In re Douglas P. BLANKENSHIP, Debtor.
Douglas P. BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION; Bond-Seven; Fairfax
Savings of Baltimore, Maryland; Metrobank N.A.; Mortgage
Guaranty Insurance Corporation; Puget Sound National Bank;
John E. Martin; Carol Martin, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-5075.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 24, 1989.
Before KRUPANSKY and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Plaintiff-debtor appeals from a district court order concluding that the bankruptcy court properly transferred venue of his bankruptcy petition and denying leave to appeal. Several defendant-creditors move for dismissal on the grounds that there is no final appealable order. The debtor responds in opposition.
The courts of appeals have jurisdiction in appeals from all "final decisions, judgments, orders, and decrees" rendered by a district court acting in review of decisions by a bankruptcy judge. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158(d). However, this court has no jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from an order denying leave to appeal; see e.g. In re Moody, 817 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1987); In re American Colonial Broadcasting Corp., 758 F.2d 794 (1st Cir.1985); In re Tidewater Group, Inc., 734 F.2d 794 (11th Cir.1984); In re Cash Currency Exchange, 762 F.2d 542 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 904 (1985); or, from orders transferring venue. Lemon v. Druffel, 253 F.2d 680 (6th Cir.1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 821 (1958); In re Dalton, 733 F.2d 710 (10th Cir.1984), cert. dismissed, Dalton v. United States, 469 U.S. 1185 (1985).
It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is granted.