Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company v. Siemens & Halske Aktiengesellschaft
Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co. v. Siemens & Halske Aktiengesellschaft, 84 F.2d 993 (2d Cir. 1936)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1936-06-22
- Topic
- litigation
84 F.2d 993 (1936) CENTRAL HANOVER BANK & TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIEMENS & HALSKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and Siemens Schuckertwerke, Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankter Haftung, Defendants-Appellants. No. 439. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. June 22, 1936.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company v. Siemens & Halske Aktiengesellschaft. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
CENTRAL HANOVER BANK & TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SIEMENS & HALSKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and Siemens Schuckertwerke, Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankter Haftung, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 439.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 22, 1936.Cravath, deGersdorff, Swaine & Wood, of New York City (William D. Whitney, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
Larkin, Rathbone & Perry, of New York City (A. M. Lewis and Charles B. McGroddy, Jr., both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Thomas F. Murphy, of New York City, amicus curiæ.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed on opinion below. 15 F.Supp. 937.