Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

In the Matter of Clyde R. James, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt. James H. Riggs, Trustee and v. Clyde R. James, Bankrupt and Edward M. Walsh, Trustee and v. Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt And

470 F.2d 996

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1972-12-22
Topic: general

470 F.2d 996 73-2 USTC P 9700 In the Matter of Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt. James H.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In the Matter of Clyde R. James, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt. James H. Riggs, Trustee and v. Clyde R. James, Bankrupt and Edward M. Walsh, Trustee and v. Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt And. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 4 opinions

470 F.2d 996

73-2 USTC P 9700

In the Matter of Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt.
In the Matter of Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt.
James H. RIGGS, Trustee and Appellant,
v.
Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt and Appellee.
Edward M. WALSH, Trustee and Appellant,
v.
Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt and Appellee.

Nos. 72-1483, 72-2311.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 22, 1972.

Burton I. Meyer (argued), of Glicksberg, Kushner & Goldberg, Harvey W. Hoffman, San Francisco, Cal., Robert R. Barton, Oakland, Cal., for appellants.

Thomas R. Adams (argued), Peter H. Reid, Ralph L. Jacobson, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County, Daly City, Cal., Hansen, Jaffe & Weiss, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Lynn Anderson Koller, (argued), of Newmark & Koller, Lafayette, Cal., for amicus curiae.

Before BARNES, KOELSCH and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The challenged Orders of the District Court are affirmed upon the authority of Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18, 91 S.Ct. 113, 27 L.Ed.2d 124 (1970), and the carefully reasoned opinion of District Judge Wollenberg. In re Cedor, 337 F. Supp. 1103 (D.C.N.D.Cal.1972).

We cannot see that our opinion in any way conflicts with In re Aveni, 458 F.2d 972 (6th Cir. 1972). There, a clearly different problem was presented.