Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

James E. Price, James E. Collier, Jr. v. The Seaboard Coastline Railroad Company, Inc.

James E. Price, James E. Collier, Jr. v. Seaboard Coastline R.R. Co., 449 F.2d 1371 (5th Cir. 1971)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1971-10-20
Topic
general

449 F.2d 1371 James E. PRICE, James E. Collier, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 71-1053.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed James E. Price, James E. Collier, Jr. v. The Seaboard Coastline Railroad Company, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

449 F.2d 1371

James E. PRICE, James E. Collier, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Inc., et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 71-1053.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 20, 1971.

Ollie L. Blan, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., Spain, Gillon, Riley, Tate & Ansley, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Drayton Nabers, Jr., Jerome A. Cooper, Benj. L. Erdreich, Cabaniss, Johnston, Gardner & Clark, Birmingham, Ala. of counsel, Edward A. Charron, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellee, Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co., Inc.

Harold A. Ross, Ross, Kraushaar & Bennett, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for appellee, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

We have carefully scrutinized this case and are of the belief that the decision reached by the Trial Judge, well expressed in detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law, is correct and should be

Affirmed.1

1

The District Court decision is reported at 332 F.Supp. 1093