Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Ramon Cortez Castro v. United States

Ramon Cortez Castro v. United States, 436 F.2d 975 (9th Cir. 1971)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1971-03-08
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On the authority of United States v. Weber, 429 F.2d 148 (9th Cir. 1970) and Quijada Gaxiola v. United States, 435 F.2d 264, (9th Cir., 1970), the order of dismissal is affirmed. 1 1 . While Judge Ely concurs in the result, he wishes it noted that he does not retreat from the views expressed in his separate concurring opinion in Quijada Qamiola.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ramon Cortez Castro v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
6 opinions
CASTRO v. UNITED STATES,436 F.2d 975(9th Cir. 1971)
Ramon Cortez CASTRO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 25197.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
February 8, 1971.
Rehearing Denied March 8, 1971.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Irving Hill, Judge.Page 976
Hunsdon C. Stewart, of Tremaine, Shenk, Stroud Roberts, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Edward J. Wallin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before DUNIWAY, ELY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate his sentence under28 U.S.C. § 2255.

On the authority of United States v. Weber,429 F.2d 148(9th Cir. 1970) and Quijada Gaxiola v. United States,435 F.2d 264, (9th Cir., 1970), the order of dismissal is affirmed.1
  1. While Judge Ely concurs in the result, he wishes it noted that he does not retreat from the views expressed in his separate concurring opinion inQuijada Gaxiola. ↩