Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Mabel Whayne v. M. v. Shuttler, Inc., Lea River Lines, Inc., and Transportation Management Service, Inc

397 F.2d 287

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1968-12-09
Topic
general

397 F.2d 287 Mabel WHAYNE, Appellant, v. M. V. SHUTTLER, INC., Lea River Lines, Inc., and Transportation Management Service, Inc. Nos. 15920, 15921.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mabel Whayne v. M. v. Shuttler, Inc., Lea River Lines, Inc., and Transportation Management Service, Inc. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
5 opinions

397 F.2d 287

Mabel WHAYNE, Appellant,
v.
M. V. SHUTTLER, INC., Lea River Lines, Inc., and
Transportation Management Service, Inc.

Nos. 15920, 15921.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 15, 1967, Reargued May 20, 1968.
Decided June 19, 1968, Certiorari Denied Dec. 9, 1968, See
89 S.Ct. 445.

Avram G. Adler, Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Joseph A. Barone, Krusen, Evans & Byrne, Philadelphia, Pa. (Robert Cox, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER, and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal arises out of civil and admiralty actions brought by Mabel Whayne against M. V. Shuttler, Inc., Lea River Lines, Inc., and Transportation Management Service, Inc. Plaintiff-libellant appeals from orders of the district court vacating service as to M. V. Shuttler, Inc., and Lea River Lines, Inc., and dismissing with prejudice the actions against Transportation Management Service, Inc.

2

We have carefully reviewed the entire record in this matter and we can find no error. Accordingly, the orders of the district court will be affirmed.