Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
William Smith, T/a W. Smith Tire Company v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. William Smith, T/a W. Smith Tire Company v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.
William Smith, T/a W. Smith Tire Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. William Smith, T/a W. Smith Tire Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 374 F.2d 892 (3d Cir. 1967)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1967-04-04
- Topic
- general
374 F.2d 892 William SMITH, t/a W. Smith Tire Company, Appellant, v. FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER CO. William SMITH, t/a W. Smith Tire Company v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed William Smith, T/a W. Smith Tire Company v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. William Smith, T/a W. Smith Tire Company v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
William SMITH, t/a W. Smith Tire Company, Appellant,
v.
FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER CO.
William SMITH, t/a W. Smith Tire Company
v.
FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER CO., Appellant.
Nos. 16100, 16101.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued March 21, 1967.
Decided April 4, 1967.
See also D.C., 255 F.Supp. 905.
Edwin J. McDermott, Philadelphia, Pa. and Bernard I. Shovlin, Philadelphia, Pa., for Smith.
Harrison G. Kildare, Philadelphia, Pa. (Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., Warrin C. Meyers, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
On review of the record of these appeals at 16100 and 16101, we find no prejudicial error. The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed, each party to bear its own costs.