Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Nolfi v. Chrysler Corp.
324 F.2d 373
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1963-11-07
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- denial of consolidation was nonappealable
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Nolfi v. Chrysler Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 11 opinions
NOLFI v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION,324 F.2d 373(3rd Cir. 1963)
Elissa NOLFI, a minor, by Philomena Nolfi Mangine, her guardian and
Philomena Nolfi Mangine, in her own right, and Richard Reading,
Plaintiffs, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, a corporation, Defendant and
Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Mary DUCSAY, formerly Mary Drain, and Alex
Drain, and Mt. Lebanon Motors, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corp., Third-Party
Defendants. Mary DUCSAY, formerly Mary Drain, and Alex Drain, Individuals,
Plaintiffs, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, a corporation, Defendant and
Third-Party Plaintiff, v. MT. LEBANON MOTORS, INC., a Pennsylvania
Corporation, Third-Party Defendant. Mt. Lebanon Motors, Inc., Appellant.
No. 14409.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued October 24, 1963.
Decided November 7, 1963.
Page 374
Before STALEY and GANEY, Circuit Judges, and NEALON, District Judge.
The appeal will be dismissed.