Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Travelers Indemnity Company, a Connecticut Corporation v. Miller Manufacturing Company, a Michigan Corporation
276 F.2d 955
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1960-04-08
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal from an order of the District Court granting separate trials of the issues raised by the complaint and the third-party complaint is hereby granted on the ground that the order sought to *956 be reviewed is not a final appealable order, but is an interlocutory order relating to a collateral matter not involving an extraordinary situation. Kowalski v. Holden, 6 Cir., 1960, 276 F.2d 359; McPherson v. Hoffman, 6 Cir., 1960, 275 F.2d 466 and Regec v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Travelers Indemnity Company, a Connecticut Corporation v. Miller Manufacturing Company, a Michigan Corporation. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal from an order of the District Court granting separate trials of the issues raised by the complaint and the third-party complaint is hereby granted on the ground that the order sought to *956 be reviewed is not a final appealable order, but is an interlocutory order relating to a collateral matter not involving an extraordinary situation. Kowalski v. Holden, 6 Cir., 1960, 276 F.2d 359; McPherson v. Hoffman, 6 Cir., 1960, 275 F.2d 466 and Regec v. Thornton, 6 Cir., 1960, 275 F.2d 801.