Opinion · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

General Tire & Rubber Company v. Local No. 512, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers of America, Afl-Cio

Gen. Tire & Rubber Co. v. Loc. No. 512, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers of Am., Afl-Cio, 294 F.2d 957 (1st Cir. 1961)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1961-10-20
Topic
litigation

294 F.2d 957 GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. LOCAL NO. 512, UNITED RUBBER, CORK, LINOLEUM AND PLASTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al., Defendants, Appellees. No. 5827. United States Court of Appeals First Circuit. October 20, 1961.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed General Tire & Rubber Company v. Local No. 512, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum and Plastic Workers of America, Afl-Cio. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

294 F.2d 957

GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
LOCAL NO. 512, UNITED RUBBER, CORK, LINOLEUM AND PLASTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 5827.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

October 20, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island; Edward William Day, Judge.

Louis S. Belkin, Cleveland, Ohio, with whom John L. Clark, Knight Edwards, Providence, R. I., Belkin, Barnett, Kent & Shapiro, Cleveland, Ohio, and Edwards & Angell, Providence, R. I., were on brief, for appellant.

Bertram Diamond, with whom Baker & Diamond, Stamford, Conn., was on brief, for appellees.

Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

We find no merit in the appellant's contentions, all of which were considered and rejected by Judge Day in his opinion reported D.C.D.R.I.1961, 191 F.Supp. 911.

2

Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the District Court.