Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Dinkens v. Attorney General of the United States
285 F.2d 430
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1961-01-23
- Topic
- bankruptcy
PER CURIAM. The judgments of the trial court in these two cases, consolidated for hearing on the trial, are hereby affirmed on the basis of the well reasoned opinion by the trial court. State of Alabama ex rel. Gallion v. Rogers, D.C., 187 F.Supp. 848.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dinkens v. Attorney General of the United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
Crum DINKENS, Mrs. Robert S. Lampley, and George Penton, as
Members of the Board of Registrars of Montgomery,
County, Alabama, Appellants,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES et al., Appellees.
STATES OF ALABAMA ex rel. MacDonald GALLION as Attorney
General of Alabama, Appellant,
v.
William P. ROGERS, Attorney General of the United States, et
al., Appellees.
Nos. 18562, 18585,
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 23, 1961.
Gordon Madison, Leslie Hall, Asst. Attys. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., Willard W. Livingston, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., for appellants.
Harold R. Tyler, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Hartwell Davis, U.S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., Harold H. Greene, Ben Brooks, Robert Owen, Howard A. Glickstein, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellees.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, JONES, Circuit Judge, and MIZE, District judge.
PER CURIAM.
The judgments of the trial court in these two cases, consolidated for hearing on the trial, are hereby affirmed on the basis of the well reasoned opinion by the trial court. State of Alabama ex rel. Gallion v. Rogers, D.C., 187 F.Supp. 848.
Affirmed.