Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Better Living, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Better Living, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm’n, 259 F.2d 271 (3d Cir. 1958)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1958-10-08
Topic
general

259 F.2d 271 BETTER LIVING, INC., a Corporation, Carl Mickelson and Fred E. Block, Individually and as Officers of said Corporation, and Also as Partners Trading as Aluminum Storm Window Company, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent. No. 12544. United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Better Living, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

259 F.2d 271

BETTER LIVING, INC., a Corporation, Carl Mickelson and Fred E. Block, Individually and as Officers of said Corporation, and Also as Partners Trading as Aluminum Storm Window Company, Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 12544.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued September 18, 1958.

Decided October 8, 1958.

On petition to review an order of the Federal Trade Commission.

Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

Joseph Lurie, Philadelphia, Pa. (Isadore A. Schrager, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioners.

James E. Corkey, Washington, D. C. (Earl W. Kintner, Gen. Counsel, James E. Corkey, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Alvin L. Berman, Atty., Washington, D. C., on the brief), for Federal Trade Commission.

PER CURIAM.

1

This is a petition for review of an order of the Federal Trade Commission directing the petitioner to cease and desist from certain business practices dealing chiefly with its advertisements. There is no law question in the case. The fact conclusions reached by the Commission have adequate support in the evidence presented.

2

The order of the Federal Trade Commission will be affirmed.