Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Alfred P. Johns, Administrator of the Estate of William A. Johns, Deceased v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation, Mary U. Johns v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation

Alfred P. Johns, Adm’r, Adm’x of the Est. of William A. Johns, Deceased v. Balt. & Ohio R.R. Co., a Corp., Mary U. Johns v. The Balt. & Ohio R.R. Co., a Corp., 239 F.2d 385 (3d Cir. 1957)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1957-01-07
Topic
general

239 F.2d 385 Alfred P. JOHNS, Administrator of the Estate of William A. Johns, Deceased, v. The BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant. Mary U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Alfred P. Johns, Administrator of the Estate of William A. Johns, Deceased v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation, Mary U. Johns v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions

239 F.2d 385

Alfred P. JOHNS, Administrator of the Estate of William A.
Johns, Deceased,
v.
The BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant.
Mary U. JOHNS,
v.
The BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant.

Nos. 12015, 12016.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Dec. 4, 1956.
Decided Jan. 7, 1957.

Vincent M. Casey, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Marvin D. Power, Margiotti & Casey, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Wray G. Zelt, Washington, Pa. (Bloom, Bloom & Yard, Washington, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, KALODNER, Circuit Judge, and KRAFT, district judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

We have examined carefully the briefs and record in these appeals and considered the oral argument of the parties. The court below committed no reversible error and consequently the judgments appealed from, 143 F.Supp. 15, will be affirmed.