Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
People of the State of California v. United States
People of the State of Cal. v. United States, 181 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1950)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1950-04-20
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. The petition for rehearing is denied.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed People of the State of California v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 12184.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
April 20, 1950.
Fred N. Howser, Atty. Gen., Hartwell H. Linney, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., State of California, for appellant.
A. DeVitt Vanech, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Frank J. Hennessy, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Emmet J. Seawell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Sacramento, Cal., Roger P. Narquis and Fred W. Smith, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Before POPE and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges and HALL, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
POPE, Circuit Judge (dissenting).
As is the practice in this court, the petition for rehearing has been submitted to the division which decided the case, and the same majority which concurred in the opinion have voted to deny a rehearing. I agree that no useful purpose would be served by a reargument before this division, but I adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion.