Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY v. Imperial Paper Box Corporation
DIXIE VORTEX Co. v. Imperial Paper Box Corp., 100 F.2d 1013 (2d Cir. 1938)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1938-12-05
- Topic
- litigation
100 F.2d 1013 (1938) DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IMPERIAL PAPER BOX CORPORATION and K. & W. Paper Novelty Corporation and Rose Radin, and Evelyn Sukoff, Copartners, Doing Business as Sunny Paper Novelty Co., and Morris Sukoff and Morris Lazow, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY v. Imperial Paper Box Corporation. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
DIXIE VORTEX COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
IMPERIAL PAPER BOX CORPORATION and K. & W. Paper Novelty Corporation and Rose Radin, and Evelyn Sukoff, Copartners, Doing Business as Sunny Paper Novelty Co., and Morris Sukoff and Morris Lazow, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 5, 1938.Carlton Hill, Charles W. Hills, Jr., Alexander C. Mabee, and M. R. Chambers, all of Chicago, Ill. (Duell & Kane, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
John P. Chandler, of New York City (H. C. Bierman, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.
Before MANTON, SWAN and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Decree, 22 F.Supp. 209, affirmed.