Opinion · Supreme Court of Connecticut
Murphy v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF STAMFORD
Murphy v. ZONING Bd. OF APPEALS OF CITY OF STAMFORD, 273 Conn. 910 (Conn. 2005)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Connecticut
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 2005-03-02
- Topic
- general
870 A.2d 1080 (2005) 273 Conn. 910 Karen A. MURPHY et al. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF the CITY OF STAMFORD et al. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Decided March 2, 2005.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Murphy v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF STAMFORD. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
870 A.2d 1080 (2005) 273 Conn. 910
Karen A. MURPHY et al.
Karen A. MURPHY et al.
v.
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF the CITY OF STAMFORD et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Decided March 2, 2005.Karen A. Murphy, pro se, and Kathleen A. Murphy, pro se, in support of the petition.
John W. Mullin, assistant corporation counsel, in opposition.
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn.App. 147, 860 A.2d 764 (2004), is denied.