Opinion · Nylaw New York

KRISTANSEN v. STEINFELDT, 256 App. Div. 824 (1939)

SOFIE KRISTANSEN, as Adm’r, Adm’x, etc., of ALF KRISTANSEN, Deceased,Appellant, v. OTTO STEINFELDT, Defendant, & MARINE BASIN COMPANY,Respondent., 256 A.D. 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1939)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1939-01-13
Topic: general

KRISTANSEN v. STEINFELDT, 256 App. Div. 824 (1939) SOFIE KRISTANSEN, as Administratrix, etc., of ALF KRISTANSEN, Deceased,Appellant, v. OTTO STEINFELDT, Defendant, and MARINE BASIN COMPANY,Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. January 13, 1939.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed KRISTANSEN v. STEINFELDT, 256 App. Div. 824 (1939). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

KRISTANSEN v. STEINFELDT,256 App. Div. 824(1939)

SOFIE KRISTANSEN, as Administratrix, etc., of ALF KRISTANSEN, Deceased,

Appellant, v. OTTO STEINFELDT, Defendant, and MARINE BASIN COMPANY,

Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

January 13, 1939.

Order dismissing, as to defendant Marine Basin Company, the second and third causes of action alleged in the amended complaint, and the judgment entered on the order, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss denied, without costs, with leave to said defendant to serve an answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. (Colbertv.Steinfeldt,255 App. Div. 790;Elliottv.Steinfeldt, 254 id. 739; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, Id. 769.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.Page 825