Opinion · Nylaw New York

COLBERT v. STEINFELDT, 255 App. Div. 790 (1938)

PHILIP J. COLBERT, as Adm’r, Adm’x, etc., of JOHN COLBERT, Deceased,Appellant, v. OTTO STEINFELDT & Another, Defendants, & MARINE BASINCOMPANY, Respondent., 255 A.D. 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1938)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1938-10-14
Topic: general

COLBERT v. STEINFELDT, 255 App. Div. 790 (1938) PHILIP J. COLBERT, as Administrator, etc., of JOHN COLBERT, Deceased,Appellant, v. OTTO STEINFELDT and Another, Defendants, and MARINE BASINCOMPANY, Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed COLBERT v. STEINFELDT, 255 App. Div. 790 (1938). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

COLBERT v. STEINFELDT,255 App. Div. 790(1938)

PHILIP J. COLBERT, as Administrator, etc., of JOHN COLBERT, Deceased,

Appellant, v. OTTO STEINFELDT and Another, Defendants, and MARINE BASIN

COMPANY, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

October 14, 1938.

Order dismissing, as to defendant Marine Basin Company, the first and third causes of action alleged in the second amended complaint, and the judgment entered on the order, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss denied, without costs, with leave to the said defendant to serve an answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon.Page 791(Elliottv.Steinfeldt,254 App. Div. 739.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.