Opinion · Nylaw New York

PORT CHESTER WINE LIQUOR SHOP v. MILLER BROS., 254 App. Div. 567 (1938)

PORT CHESTER WINE LIQUOR SHOP, INC., & JOSEPH GIOFFRE, Appellants, v.MILLER BROS. FRUITERERS, INC., Respondent., 254 A.D. 567 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1938)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction
Nylaw
Date
1938-03-11
Topic
general

PORT CHESTER WINE LIQUOR SHOP v. MILLER BROS., 254 App. Div. 567 (1938) PORT CHESTER WINE LIQUOR SHOP, INC., and JOSEPH GIOFFRE, Appellants, v.MILLER BROS. FRUITERERS, INC., Respondent.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. March 11, 1938.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PORT CHESTER WINE LIQUOR SHOP v. MILLER BROS., 254 App. Div. 567 (1938). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PORT CHESTER WINE LIQUOR SHOP v. MILLER BROS.,254 App. Div. 567(1938)
PORT CHESTER WINE LIQUOR SHOP, INC., and JOSEPH GIOFFRE, Appellants, v.
MILLER BROS. FRUITERERS, INC., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
March 11, 1938.
Motion for leave to appealPage 568to the Court of Appeals denied. If a final judgment eventuates, leave will be granted. This course will facilitate an authoritative final determination. (Williamsv.Quill,303 U.S. 621, decided February 28, 1938.)fn*Motion for stay denied.
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.
  1. Appeal dismissed for the want of a final determination. See, also,Williamsv.Quill(165 Misc. 99; affd.,253 App. Div. 737; affd.,277 N.Y. 1). — [REP. ↩