Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Rust v. Pratt

303 U.S. 621

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1938-02-28
Topic
general

Per Curiam: The appeals herein are dismissed (1) for the reason that the judgments sought to be reviewed are based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support them, Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U. S. 690; Cox v. Colorado, 282 U. S. 807; Woolsey v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rust v. Pratt. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
8 opinions

Per Curiam:

The appeals herein are dismissed (1) for the reason that the judgments sought to be reviewed are based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support them, Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U. S. 690; Cox v. Colorado, 282 U. S. 807; Woolsey v. Best, 299 U. S. 1; (2) for the want of a substantial federal question, Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78, 106, 111-114; Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U. S. 97, 105; Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U. S. 278, 285; Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U. S. 319.

Reported below: 157 Ore. 505; 72 P. 2d 533.