Opinion · Nylaw New York

COHEN v. ROSEVALE REALTY COMPANY, INC., 206 App. Div. 681 (1923)

CHARLES COHEN & Another, Respondents, v. ROSEVALE REALTY Co., INC.,Appellant., 206 A.D. 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1923)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1923-01-01
Topic: general

COHEN v. ROSEVALE REALTY COMPANY, INC., 206 App. Div. 681 (1923) CHARLES COHEN and Another, Respondents, v. ROSEVALE REALTY COMPANY, INC.,Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. April, 1923.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed COHEN v. ROSEVALE REALTY COMPANY, INC., 206 App. Div. 681 (1923). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

COHEN v. ROSEVALE REALTY COMPANY, INC.,206 App. Div. 681(1923)

CHARLES COHEN and Another, Respondents, v. ROSEVALE REALTY COMPANY, INC.,

Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

April, 1923.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We are not disposed to interfere with the discretion of the justice at Special Term, who granted the motion for a temporary injunction. The case shouldPage 682be tried, and the rights of the parties determined upon findings of fact and conclusions of law made after a trial. (Bergen BeachLand Corporationv.City of New York,192 App. Div. 884.) Kelly, P.J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.