Opinion · Nylaw New York

HOLLAND FOOD CORP. v. FIFTY-SECOND ST. STG., 192 App. Div. 884 (1920)

HOLLAND FOOD Corp., Respondent, v. FIFTY-SECOND St. STORAGECOMPANY, INC., Appellant., 192 A.D. 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. 1920)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nylaw New York
Jurisdiction: Nylaw
Date: 1920-01-01
Topic: general

HOLLAND FOOD CORP. v. FIFTY-SECOND ST. STG., 192 App. Div. 884 (1920) HOLLAND FOOD CORPORATION, Respondent, v. FIFTY-SECOND STREET STORAGECOMPANY, INC., Appellant.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed HOLLAND FOOD CORP. v. FIFTY-SECOND ST. STG., 192 App. Div. 884 (1920). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HOLLAND FOOD CORP. v. FIFTY-SECOND ST. STG.,192 App. Div. 884(1920)

HOLLAND FOOD CORPORATION, Respondent, v. FIFTY-SECOND STREET STORAGE

COMPANY, INC., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

April, 1920.

Judgment and order of the County Court of Kings county reversed, with costs to appellant to abide the event, and new trial ordered in said court, upon the ground that the trial court erred to the manifest and substantial prejudice of defendant in excluding its offered evidence to show the condition of the ceiling as to stains at the time of the trial, defendant having shown that that condition had remained unchanged, and also in receiving evidence that defendant's manager said that it would adjust plaintiff's claim. Jenks, P.J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.