Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Drd v. Edh
600 Pa. 733
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2008-12-17
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- explaining claim that verdict was against weight of evidence shall be raised with trial judge in motion for new trial orally, on record, at any time before sentencing, by written motion at any time before sentencing, or in post-sentence motion, pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 607(A
- explaining claim that verdict was against weight of evidence shall be raised with trial judge in motion for new trial orally, on record, at any time before sentencing, by written motion at any time before sentencing, or in postsentence motion, pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 607(A
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Drd v. Edh. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
963 A.2d 470 (2008)
D.R.D.
No. 393 WAL (2008).
D.R.D.
v.
E.D.H.
No. 393 WAL (2008).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
December 17, 2008.Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.