Opinion · New Jersey Superior Court
Dunleavy v. Tietjen & Lang Dry Docks
20 N.J. Super. 486
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- New Jersey Superior Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1952-07-09
- Topic
- general
20 N.J. Super. 486 (1952) 90 A.2d 84 EDWARD DUNLEAVY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. TIETJEN & LANG DRY DOCKS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued July 7, 1952.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dunleavy v. Tietjen & Lang Dry Docks. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
EDWARD DUNLEAVY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
TIETJEN & LANG DRY DOCKS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued July 7, 1952. Decided July 9, 1952.Before Judges JAYNE, COLIE and GRIMSHAW.
Mr. Patrick F. McDevitt argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Reich & McDevitt, attorneys).
Mr. Walter H. Jones argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Walter R. Hespe, of counsel on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Drewen reported in 17 N.J. Super. 76 (Cty. Ct. 1951).