How later courts describe this case

• holding that per quod damages are not available under the LAD because the Legislature "did not intend to establish a cause of action for any person other than the individual against whom the discrimination was directed."
• predicting that New Jersey Supreme Court would hold the NJLAD preempts a common law claim for wrongful discharge on . grounds of racial discrimination
• "[S]upplementary common law causes of action may not go to the jury when a statutory remedy under the LAD exists."
• manual which insured “open communication” through access to the company president, but which did not discuss termination or dismissal procedures, could not reasonably create an expectation of a contract