Opinion · Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
STATE v. LINARES, 228 Conn. 907 (1993)
634 A.2d 297
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Connecticut Appellate Court Opinions
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut
- Date
- 1993-10-28
- Topic
- general
STATE v. LINARES, 228 Conn. 907 (1993) 634 A.2d 297 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. KATHALEEN LINARES (14861x01)Supreme Court of Connecticut The state of Connecticut's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 656 (AC 10910), is granted, limited to the following issue: "Whether General Statutes 2-1d (a)(2)(E)'s prohibition against `any act which disturbs, disrupts or interferes with' the legislative process is facially over-broad for first amendment purposes?" Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE v. LINARES, 228 Conn. 907 (1993). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
"Whether General Statutes2-1d(a)(2)(E)'s prohibition against `any act which disturbs, disrupts or interferes with' the legislative process is facially over-broad for first amendment purposes?"Page 908