Opinion · Wisconsin Supreme Court
Olson v. Cunningham
200 Wis. 610
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Wisconsin Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Wisconsin
- Date
- 1930-02-04
- Topic
- bankruptcy
Owen, J. The Justices participating in the consideration of this case are equally divided, Mr. Chief Justice Rosen-berry, Mr. Justice Stevens, and Mr. Justice Fritz being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, while Mr.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Olson v. Cunningham. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 56 opinions
The Justices participating in the consideration of this case are equally divided, Mr. Chief Justice Rosen-berry, Mr. Justice Stevens, and Mr. Justice Fritz being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Crownhart, Mr. Justice Fowler, and the writer are of the opinion that it should be affirmed. Under .the well established rule, the judgment must be affirmed.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.