Opinion · Wisconsin Supreme Court
Dow v. Deissner
Dow v. Deissner, 105 Wis. 385 (Wis. 1900)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Wisconsin Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Wisconsin
- Date
- 1900-02-02
- Topic
- general
The following opinion was filed November 24, 1899: Cassoday, C. J. This is an action to recover the value of a car load of flour obtained by the defendants, Dwinnell and. Deissner, by falsely and fraudulently colluding to defraud the plaintiffs, and by making false representations to the-plaintiffs, and upon which they relied. The defendants appear to have separately answered.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Dow v. Deissner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
The following opinion was filed November 24, 1899:
Cassoday, C. J.This is an action to recover the value of a car load of flour obtained by the defendants, Dwinnell and. Deissner, by falsely and fraudulently colluding to defraud the plaintiffs, and by making false representations to the-plaintiffs, and upon which they relied. The defendants appear to have separately answered. There is no bill of exceptions. The appeal is from the judgment, which recites that the complaint was dismissed on demurrer oto tenus, interposed by the defendant Deissner. We have just held that the sustaining of a demurrer ore tenus is nothing more than a ruling of the court in sustaining an objection to evidence offered by the appellants upon the trial. Mandelert v. Superior C. L. Co. 104 Wis. 423. To review such ruling, there must, be an exception to the same embodied in the record. Williams v. Holmes, 7 Wis. 168; Tubbs v. Doll, 15 Wis. 640; Cornell v. Davis, 16 Wis. 686; Keller v. Gilman, 96 Wis. 445. It is not “an intermediate order or determination of the court below,”"
By the Court-.— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.