Opinion · Washington Supreme Court
Miller v. Kennedy
85 Wash. 2d 151
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Washington Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Date
- 1975-01-16
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- "[w]e can add nothing constructive to the well considered opinion of that court and, accordingly, approve and adopt the reasoning thereof"
- operation without consent is battery; failure to advise patient of perils is considered under negligence concepts
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Miller v. Kennedy. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 86 opinions
We granted a petition for review of the Court of Appeals disposition of issues revolving about the doctrines of res ipsa loquitur and informed consent in a medical malpractice case. Miller v. Kennedy, 11 Wn. App. 272, 522 P.2d 852 (1974), petition for review granted, 84 Wn.2d 1008 (1974).
*152 Our review of the record convinces us that the Court of Appeals did not err in its discussion or disposition of the issues involved. We can add nothing constructive to the well considered opinion of that court and, accordingly, approve and adopt the reasoning thereof.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.