Opinion · Washington Supreme Court
Matter Of Marriage Of Cardwell v. Cardwell
Matter Of Marriage Of Cardwell v. Cardwell, 192 Wash. 2d 1025 (Wash. 2019)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Washington Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Date
- 2019-03-06
- Topic
- general
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its March 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered. ¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED: ¶ 3 The Respondent's motion for extension of time to file an answer to the petition for review is denied. The petition for review is also denied. For the Court /s/ Fairhurst, CJ. CHIEF JUSTICE
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Matter Of Marriage Of Cardwell v. Cardwell. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its March 5, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 The Respondent's motion for extension of time to file an answer to the petition for review is denied. The petition for review is also denied.
For the Court
/s/ Fairhurst, CJ. CHIEF JUSTICE