Toolkit · Government
The Conflict Screening, Recusal Memo, and Post-Employment Analysis Toolkit
18 U.S.C. § 208
- Type
- Toolkit
- Jurisdiction
- National
- Date
- 2024-12-02
- Topic
- Government
This toolkit supplies the working documents for government ethics practice. It opens with a conflict analysis worksheet running the statutory elements in order, including the exemption screen that resolves most questions without divestiture, and an instrument selection table so that officials do not divest holdings that were already exempt. It provides a written ethics advice request, a recusal memorandum, a screening arrangement, and a gift acceptance log — the documents that later prove an official did the right thing. It includes an ethics agreement outline for appointees, a post-employment analysis worksheet with the three bars and their expirations, a firm screening memorandum, a disclosure update notice, a self-report letter, an investigation interview preparation sheet built around the false statement exposure, and an authority reference sheet.
The Conflict Screening, Recusal Memo, and Post-Employment Analysis Toolkit
Government > Government Ethics, Conflicts of Interest, and the Revolving Door | Published 2 December 2024 - Updated 24 December 2025 | UpLaw - uplaw.us
How to use this toolkit
Tool 1 analyzes the question. Tools 2 through 6 produce the documents that resolve it. Tools 7 through 10 handle departure and private practice. Tools 11 and 12 handle correction and investigation. Tool 13 is the authority.
⚠️ Every instrument here takes minutes to create and is unavailable retroactively. Investigations that end badly for officials who behaved correctly are almost always investigations in which nothing was written down.
Tool 1 — Conflict analysis worksheet
Official ______ Position ______ Matter ______ Date ______
| Step | Question | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Is there a particular matter? Involving specific parties, or of general applicability? | |
| 2 | Is participation personal and substantial? (decision, approval, recommendation, advice, investigation) | |
| 3 | Is there a financial interest? Whose? | |
| 4 | Imputed persons checked: spouse ☐ minor child ☐ general partner ☐ organization where the official serves ☐ prospective employer ☐ | |
| 5 | Is the interest exempt under 5 C.F.R. Part 2640? Which exemption? | |
| 6 | If not exempt, which instrument? waiver / recusal / divestiture / resignation | |
| 7 | Does the impartiality rule apply even without a financial interest? | |
| 8 | Is the instrument documented and distributed? |
☐ Governing provisions — 18 U.S.C. § 208 ☐ 18 U.S.C. § 216 ☐ 5 C.F.R. Part 2635 ☐ ☐ ⚠️ The answer is almost never "no." It is "yes, after this document exists."
Tool 2 — Instrument selection table
| Instrument | When used | Issuer | Public? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory exemption | Interest falls within a listed category | Automatic — no instrument | n/a |
| Individual waiver | Interest not substantial enough to affect the integrity of the employee's services | Appointing official | Often, for senior officials |
| Impartiality authorization | Appearance concern with no financial interest | Agency designated official | Usually internal |
| Recusal memorandum | Non-exempt interest, participation avoidable | The official | Internal, distributed |
| Screening arrangement | Recurring matters implicating a recusal | Official and supervisor | Internal |
| Divestiture with certificate | Recusal impractical because the interest is pervasive | Ethics office certifies | Filed |
| Qualified trust | Very senior official with complex holdings | Approved in advance | Public |
| Resignation from outside position | Officer, director, or trustee role creating imputed interest | The official | Disclosed |
☐ ⚠️ Officials routinely divest holdings that were already exempt, and establish trusts where a single divestiture would suffice. Select the least drastic effective instrument.
Tool 3 — Written ethics advice request
REQUEST FOR ETHICS ADVICE To: Designated Agency Ethics Official From: ______ Position: ______ Date: ______
1. The facts. [State them completely and accurately, including amounts, dates, names, and relationships. Do not characterize — describe.]
2. The matter. [Identify the particular matter, the parties, and the official's role in it.]
3. The interest. [Identify the holding, position, or relationship, with its value or nature. If a spouse or family member is involved, say so explicitly.]
4. The question. [Ask it precisely.]
5. What the official proposes to do. [Participate / recuse / seek a waiver / divest.]
6. Timing. [When a decision is needed and why.]
☐ ⚠️ Incomplete facts destroy the protection. Advice is only as good as its premises; describing a holding as "small" without the amount protects nothing. ☐ Answer retained with the request ☐ Filed where it can be found years later ☐ ☐ Requested before acting ☐
Tool 4 — Recusal memorandum
MEMORANDUM OF RECUSAL From: ______ To: [supervisor, staff, records] Date: ______
Effective immediately, I am recused from participating personally or substantially in the following:
☐ Specific matter: ______ ☐ Category of matters: all particular matters involving specific parties in which ______ is a party or represents a party.
Reason: ______ [financial interest / impartiality / prospective employment / former employer]
Duration: ______ [until divestiture completes / for the duration of employment discussions / permanently]
Alternate decision-maker: ______
Instructions to staff: Do not brief me on, forward to me, or seek my approval on any matter within the scope above. Route such matters to the alternate named. If you are uncertain whether a matter is within scope, route it to the alternate and notify the ethics official.
☐ Distributed to supervisor ☐ staff ☐ records ☐ ethics official ☐ ☐ Acknowledgments collected ☐ Filed ☐ ☐ ⚠️ A recusal honored but undocumented is indistinguishable, three years later, from one that never happened ☐
Tool 5 — Screening arrangement
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Official recused | |
| Scope of recusal | |
| Alternate decision-maker | |
| Who maintains the recusal list | |
| System in which the list is enforced (case assignment, workflow, correspondence) | |
| Procedure when a matter of uncertain scope arises | |
| Notification to external parties, if any | |
| Review date |
☐ Recusal integrated with the case assignment or workflow system where one exists ☐ ☐ ⚠️ Where recusals are not integrated with assignment systems, they fail — not through bad faith, but because a busy official cannot personally screen every incoming matter. ☐ Staff briefed and acknowledgment recorded ☐ ☐ Arrangement reviewed on any change of duties ☐
Tool 6 — Gift acceptance log
| Date | Item or benefit | Source | Prohibited source? | Value | Exception relied on | Written determination? | Aggregate to date, this source, this year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exception codes: NV = nominal value · RF = refreshments not a meal · DISC = discount available to the public or all employees · AWARD = bona fide award for meritorious public service · PR = personal relationship · WAG = widely attended gathering · SOC = social invitation from a non-prohibited source
☐ ⚠️ Aggregation checked per source, per occasion, and per year ☐ ☐ ⚠️ Personal relationship exception applied only where the relationship, not the position, motivated the gift ☐ ☐ Widely attended gathering determinations obtained in writing before attendance ☐ ☐ Cross-branch prohibition noted — 5 U.S.C. § 7353 ☐ Salary supplementation prohibited — 18 U.S.C. § 209 ☐
Tool 7 — Ethics agreement outline for an appointee
ETHICS AGREEMENT — [nominee] — [position]
1. Assets. I will divest the following within ______ days of confirmation: ______. I will seek a certificate of divestiture for each. Until divestiture, I will not participate personally and substantially in any particular matter that to my knowledge has a direct and predictable effect on these interests.
2. Positions. I will resign from the following positions upon confirmation: ______.
3. Former employer. For ______ after my last day of employment with ______, I will not participate personally and substantially in any particular matter involving specific parties in which ______ is a party or represents a party, unless authorized.
4. Continuing arrangements. I have the following continuing financial arrangements with a former employer: ______. I will not participate in matters affecting that entity while they continue.
5. Spousal and family interests. ______
6. Screening. I will establish a written screening arrangement with my staff naming ______ as the alternate decision-maker for recused matters.
7. Retirement plans. ______
8. Duration. Each commitment above continues until ______.
☐ ⚠️ This document determines what the official may work on for the entire tenure ☐ Drafted at the moment of least attention and nearly impossible to revisit. ☐ Exemptions checked before agreeing to any divestiture ☐ ☐ Durations stated for every commitment ☐
Tool 8 — Post-employment analysis worksheet
Departing official ______ Last day ______ Seniority category ______
| Bar | Scope | Matters identified | Expires |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lifetime — particular matters involving specific parties, personal and substantial participation | Never | ||
| Two-year — particular matters involving specific parties pending under official responsibility in the last year | |||
| One-year senior — any communication or appearance before the former agency with intent to influence | All matters | n/a | |
| Very senior — extended period, wider set of agencies | |||
| Trade and treaty negotiation | |||
| Foreign entity representation |
☐ Framework — 18 U.S.C. § 207 ☐ Guidance — 5 C.F.R. Part 2641 ☐ ☐ ⚠️ These restrict representation and communication, not employment or internal advice ☐ ☐ ⚠️ They apply to the individual, not the firm ☐ ☐ Lobbying registration analyzed — 2 U.S.C. § 1601 ☐ Foreign agent registration analyzed — 22 U.S.C. § 611 ☐ ☐ Procurement post-employment restrictions checked — 41 U.S.C. § 2104 ☐ ☐ Expiration dates calendared with reminders ☐
Tool 9 — Firm screening memorandum
SCREENING MEMORANDUM — [former official] — effective [date]
[Name] joined the firm on [date] after service at [agency]. Under 18 U.S.C. § 207, [name] is restricted as follows: [list bars and expirations].
Accordingly, effective immediately:
- [Name] will not communicate with or appear before [agency] on behalf of any client until [date].
- [Name] will not work on, be consulted about, or receive information regarding the matters listed in Schedule A at any time.
- Firm personnel will not discuss those matters in [name]'s presence or send materials concerning them to [name].
- Electronic files for those matters are restricted; [name]'s access has been removed.
- [Name] will receive no share of fees from the matters in Schedule A.
- Questions about scope go to [conflicts counsel] before, not after, any contact.
Please acknowledge receipt.
☐ Executed before the first day ☐ Acknowledgments collected from every person on the matter teams ☐ ☐ Conflict system flagged ☐ File access restricted and verified ☐ ☐ Fee-sharing exclusion implemented in the accounting system ☐
Tool 10 — Disclosure update notice
DISCLOSURE UPDATE — [official] — [date]
Change: ☐ asset acquired ☐ asset disposed ☐ liability incurred ☐ outside position accepted or resigned ☐ spousal employment change ☐ gift or reimbursement received ☐ agreement with a former or future employer ☐ inheritance or gift received
Details: ______ Effective date of the change: ______
Matters currently pending in which the official participates that may be affected: ______
Action proposed: ☐ none required (exempt) ☐ recusal ☐ waiver request ☐ divestiture ☐ resignation
☐ Filed when the change occurs, not at the annual deadline ☐ ☐ Any affected pending matter identified and addressed the same day ☐ ☐ ⚠️ An omission on a disclosure report becomes a false statement problem far larger than the omitted asset — see 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
Tool 11 — Self-report letter
VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE — [official] — [date]
I am reporting the following, which I identified on [date]:
What occurred: ______ [precisely; dates, matters, and actions taken] Why it may present an issue: ______ What I did on identifying it: ______ [ceased participation, notified supervisor, corrected the record] Whether the action can be unwound, and how: ______ What I propose going forward: ______ [recusal, screening, divestiture] Documents attached: ______
☐ Filed promptly after identification ☐ ☐ ⚠️ Self-correction is treated very differently from discovery — frequently the difference between a counseling memorandum and a referral ☐ ☐ Record corrected wherever the affected action appears ☐ ☐ Counsel consulted before filing where criminal exposure is conceivable ☐
Tool 12 — Investigation interview preparation
☐ Separate counsel engaged where the official's interests may diverge from the agency's ☐ ☐ Document preservation instruction issued ☐ ☐ All written ethics advice located and reviewed ☐ ☐ All recusal memoranda, screening arrangements, and gift log entries assembled ☐ ☐ Timeline reconstructed from documents, not memory ☐ ☐ ⚠️ Prepare with 18 U.S.C. § 1001 firmly in view ☐ The underlying violation is frequently minor; the answer given from memory produces the serious charge. ☐ Practiced: answer the question asked ☐ do not speculate ☐ say "I do not recall" when true ☐ ask to see the document ☐ ☐ Understand that the ethics official's advisory relationship is not privileged in the way an attorney-client relationship is ☐ ☐ Post-interview memorandum prepared the same day ☐
Tool 13 — Authority reference sheet
Conflicts and related prohibitions
- 18 U.S.C. § 203 · 18 U.S.C. § 205 · 18 U.S.C. § 207 · 18 U.S.C. § 208 · 18 U.S.C. § 209 · 18 U.S.C. § 216
- 5 U.S.C. § 7353 · 5 C.F.R. Part 2635 · 5 C.F.R. Part 2634 · 5 C.F.R. Part 2640 · 5 C.F.R. Part 2641 · 5 C.F.R. Part 2638
Political activity
- 5 U.S.C. § 7301 · 5 U.S.C. § 7321 · 5 U.S.C. § 7323 · 5 U.S.C. § 7324 · 5 C.F.R. Part 734 · 18 U.S.C. § 1913
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers · United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell · United States v. National Treasury Employees Union
Registration and procurement
- 2 U.S.C. § 1601 · 22 U.S.C. § 611 · 41 U.S.C. § 2102 · 41 U.S.C. § 2103 · 41 U.S.C. § 2104 · 48 C.F.R. Part 3
Criminal standards
- 18 U.S.C. § 201 · 18 U.S.C. § 666 · 18 U.S.C. § 1001 · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1346
- United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of California · McDonnell v. United States · Skilling v. United States · Kelly v. United States
- Ciminelli v. United States · Percoco v. United States · Snyder v. United States · Evans v. United States · McCormick v. United States
Adjudicative disqualification
Tool 14 — Recurring situations and the correct sequence
Each of these arrives regularly. Each has a settled answer, and the answer is a sequence rather than a rule.
| Situation | Sequence |
|---|---|
| Official offered a job by a party to a matter she is deciding | Stop the conversation → notify ethics official and supervisor in writing → recuse with a memorandum and a named alternate → then resume the discussion. ⚠️ Finishing the evaluation first is the violation. |
| Invitation to a contractor's event | Prohibited source analysis → exception identified → written determination before attending → logged |
| Spouse hired by a regulated company | No conflict from hiring; interest arises through salary and equity, imputed → recusal from particular matters involving that company → screening arrangement → impartiality analysis for adjacent matters |
| Departing lawyer joins a firm representing a regulated company | List lifetime-bar matters → list two-year-bar matters → calendar the one-year expiration → firm screen executed before day one → he may advise internally throughout |
| Council member's company is low bidder | Read the state contracting prohibition (most are absolute) → check narrow exceptions → advisory opinion before the bid is submitted |
| Industry award with paid travel | Award exception analysis → separate travel acceptance analysis → widely attended gathering analysis for the ceremony. Frequently the award may be accepted and the travel may not. |
| Partisan social media post during the workday | Prohibited regardless of device or account → immediate deletion → self-report → documented reminder. A repeat is treated as willful. |
| Inherited stock in a regulated entity | Update disclosure immediately → exemption screen → if not exempt, recusal or divestiture with a certificate |
| Former colleague calls asking a favor during the one-year bar | Decline the communication → refer to a non-restricted colleague → document the refusal |
☐ Sequence followed and each step documented ☐ ☐ ⚠️ The pattern across all of them: the answer is almost never "no." It is "yes, after this document exists."
Tool 15 — Program self-assessment for an institution
| Element | Present? | Evidence | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethics office exists and is resourced | |||
| Advisory requests answered within a defined time | |||
| Recusals integrated with case assignment or workflow | ⚠️ Where absent, recusals fail | ||
| Training delivered and completion documented | |||
| Entry disclosure reviewed against the position description | |||
| Departure counseling routine, not optional | |||
| Gift logs and recusal memoranda retained centrally | |||
| Screening arrangements reviewed on change of duties | |||
| Advisory relationship's non-privileged character communicated | |||
| Program measured by calls received before acting, not violations found |
☐ ⚠️ Programs experienced as obstacles produce fewer calls, later, about worse facts ☐ ☐ Annual report to leadership with metrics on advice volume and turnaround ☐ ☐ Recusal list reconciled with actual case assignments quarterly ☐
Related Documents
- The Conflict Is Legal, Acting on It Is Not: How Government Ethics Law Actually Works
- Government Ethics: A Comprehensive Guide to Financial Conflicts, Gifts, Post-Employment Restrictions, and Enforcement
- Entering or Leaving Government Service: A Practical Ethics Checklist
- The Government Contracts Toolkit
- Government by Covenant: How Homeowners Associations Get Their Power and Where It Ends
- Government Surveillance and Digital Privacy: A Comprehensive Guide to the Fourth Amendment, ECPA, FISA, and Modern Investigative Tools
- The Wage the Government Sets: How Prevailing Wage Law Actually Works
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility: A Comprehensive Guide to the Model Rules
- The Legal Ethics and Law Practice Management Toolkit
- The Open-Source Law Firm: Building a Cost-Effective, Ethics-Compliant Technology Stack
- Lobbying, FARA, and Government Ethics: A Comprehensive Compliance Guide
- Registering to Ask: Lobbying Disclosure, FARA, and the Line Between Advocacy and Agency
- Registering and Reporting as a Lobbyist: A Practical Compliance Checklist
- The Government Transparency and Public Records Toolkit
- Ask and It Shall Be Redacted: How Public Records Laws Actually Work
- Drafting, Filing, and Appealing a Public Records Request: A Practical Checklist
- Public Records and Open Government: A Comprehensive Guide to FOIA, State Acts, Exemptions, and Appeals
- The Vote Taken in the Parking Lot: How Open Meetings Law Actually Works
- The Open Meetings Compliance, Agenda, and Violation Challenge Toolkit
- Open Meetings and Public Body Procedure: A Comprehensive Guide to Notice, Quorum, Executive Session, and Remedies
- Federal Grants and Funding Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide to the Uniform Guidance, Cost Principles, Subrecipients, and Audits
- Utility Patents Explained: Subject Matter, Requirements, and How One Is Granted
- The Money Comes With Rules: How Federal Grant Law Actually Works
- The Federal Grant Application, Subaward, and Single Audit Toolkit
- The 45 Nice Classes: How Trademark Classification Shapes Cost, Scope, and Conflict
- Nonprofit Governance and Tax-Exempt Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide to Boards, Conflicts, Excess Benefits, and Filings
- Running a Conflicts Check: A Practical Checklist
- The Board Governance, Conflict of Interest, and Form 990 Toolkit
- Campaign Finance Compliance for Candidates and PACs: A Practical Checklist
- Responding to a Union Organizing Campaign: A Practical Checklist
- Clearing an Advertising Campaign: A Substantiation and Disclosure Checklist
- Citizens United and the Road Ahead for Federal Campaign Finance Reform
- Nonprofit Governance: A Comprehensive Guide to Formation, Exemption, and Fiduciary Duty
- Nobody Owns a Nonprofit: How Nonprofit Governance Actually Works