Opinion · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Owen v. State

525 S.W.2d 164

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jurisdiction
Texas
Date
1975-07-23
Topic
bankruptcy

How later courts describe this case

  • holding prosecutions of driving while intoxicated do not require proof of a culpable mental state
  • appellant assessed 30 days in jail for driving while intoxicated

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Owen v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
31 opinions

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the misdemeanor offense of driving and operating a motor vehicle on a public highway while intoxicated, which the proof shows was committed on February 1, 1974. The punishment assessed was confinement in the county jail for thirty days and a fine of fifty dollars.

The appellant urges that this conviction is void because the pleadings do not allege and the proof does not show that the appellant either intentionally, knowingly, recklessly or with criminal negligence committed the offense of driving and operating a motor vehicle on a public highway while intoxicated. She argues that V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Sections 1.03(b) and 6.02 now require that the state allege and prove that an accused had one of these culpable mental states when committing the offense of driving while intoxicated. The contention made here by the appellant is the same as was made by the petitioner in Ex parte Ross, 522 S.W.2d 214 (Tex.Cr.App.1975). This Court in that case rejected the petitioner’s contention with a well reasoned explanation which need not be repeated here. The holding in that appeal was that the Legislature by enactment of Sections 1.03(b) and 6.02 of the new Penal Code did not intend to require proof of a culpable mental state in prosecutions for driving *165 while intoxicated. The appellant’s ground of error is overruled.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.