Opinion · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Molitor v. State
1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 145
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- Jurisdiction
- Texas
- Date
- 1993-09-22
- Topic
- litigation
in murder case where appellant objected that two photographs showing deceased with his children were “irrelevant and prejudicial[,]” holding that objection was “too broad, general and global” to preserve error under Rule 403 | blow to the head not deadly force
Citator
- Cited by
- 28 opinions
OPINION ON MOTION TO ABATE APPEAL
CAMPBELL, Judge.Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of murder. The jury assessed punishment at life.
Appellant’s conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Molitor v. State, 827 S.W.2d 512 (Tex.App.—Austin 1992). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review. In an opinion delivered on June 16, 1993, we reversed the judgment of the court *616 of appeals upon concluding that court had erroneously upheld the trial court’s refusal to submit appellant’s requested jury instruction on the lesser included offense of criminally negligent homicide. Molitor v. State (Tex.Cr.App. No. 526-92, delivered June 16,1993).
The State has filed a motion to abate the appeal. Attached to the motion is a certified copy of appellant’s certificate of death. The certificate recites that appellant died on March 31, 1993.
The death of an appellant during the pen-dency of an appeal deprives both this Court and the court of appeals of jurisdiction. See Garcia v. State, 840 S.W.2d 957 (Tex.Cr.App.1992). Under these circumstances, the appropriate disposition is the abatement of the appeal. Tex.R.App.Pro. Rule 9(b). Accordingly, the State’s motion for rehearing is dismissed, the prior opinion is withdrawn, and the appeal is permanently abated.