Opinion · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Clemons v. State
Clemons v. State, 414 S.W.2d 940 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- Jurisdiction
- Texas
- Date
- 1967-04-12
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- explaining that because “no sentence was ever pronounced, the trial court may now pronounce sentence and appellant may then appeal from that sentence if he so desires”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Clemons v. State. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 23 opinions
CLEMONS v. STATE,414 S.W.2d 940(Tex.Cr.App. 1967)
414 S.W.2d 940
Lonnie CLEMONS, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 40287.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
April 12, 1967.
Motion to Reinstate Appeal Denied May 17, 1967.
Sam L. Gayle, Jr., County Atty., Edna, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
OPINION
Notice of appeal was given after January 1, 1966.
The record on appeal does not include sentence pronounced by the court, as required by Arts. 40.09(1) and 42.02 Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.
The appeal is dismissed.
OPINION ON APPELLANT'S MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL
We observe that the written notice of appeal contained in the record expressly states that sentence was imposed. If such a sentence was pronounced and entered of record, but was not included in the record on appeal as required by Article 40.09, Section 1, V.A.C.C.P., it may be forwarded to this Court under proper certification. See Culbert v. State, Tex.Cr.App.,415 S.W.2d 646.
If a sentence was in fact pronounced in the case at bar but there was a failure for some reason to enter such sentence it may be entered nunc pro tunc. Article 42.06, V.A.C.C.P.
If, on the other hand, no sentence was ever pronounced, the trial court may now pronounce sentence and appellant may then appeal from that sentence if he so desires.
Appellant's motion to reinstate his appeal is overruled.Page 942