Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply Co.

holding that where return showed Henry Bunting was served and petition alleged Henry Bunting, Jr. was proper registered agent of defendant, record did not show that correct person was served | holding that citation to and service on "Henry Bunting," not "Henry Bunting, Jr .," were defective | holding that service was ineffective when the person served was “Henry Bunting,” but the registered agent was “Henry Bunting, Jr.” | holding that citation was invalid because it named “Henry Bunting,” and not Henry Bunting Jr., as defendant | holding that citation to and service on "Henry Bunting," not "Henry Bunting, Jr .," were defective | holding that citation to and service on “Henry Bunting,” not “Henry Bunting, Jr.,” were defective | holding that citation to and service on “Henry Bunting,” not “Henry Bunting, Jr.,” were defective | holding that where return showed Henry Bunting was served and petition alleged Henry Bunting, Jr. was proper registered agent of defendant, record did not show that correct person was served | holding that where return showed Henry Bunting was served and petition alleged Henry Bunting, Jr. was proper registered agent of defendant, record did not show that correct person was served | holding that record did not show that person named in return of service, Henry Bunting, was authorized to receive service for, or was connected with, defendant named in petition, when registered agent for defendant named in petition was Henry Bunting, Jr. | holding service invalid where registered agent named “Henry Bunting, Jr.” but service delivered to “Henry Bunting” | stating that "failure to affirmatively show strict compliance with the Rules of Civil Procedure renders the attempted service of process invalid and of no effect." | holding failure to affirmatively show strict compliance with rules of service renders attempted service of process invalid and of no effect | holding no strict compliance when original petition stated entity could be served by serving its registered agent “Henry Bunting, Jr.” and return of service stated that sheriff served “Henry Bunting” | holding no strict compliance when original petition stated entity could be 9 served by serving its registered agent “Henry Bunting, Jr.” and return of service stated that sheriff served “Henry Bunting” | holding the name of the agent for service of process alleged in plaintiff = s petition must match the name of the agent upon who process was served as reflected in the return | delivering citation to “Henry Bunting” ineffective when petition alleges that registered agent is “Henry Bunting, Jr.” | noting petition identified registered agent for service as “Henry Bunting, Jr.” but citation and return of service reflected delivery to “Henry Bunting” | stating “failure to affirmatively show strict compliance with the Rules of Civil Procedure renders the attempted service of process invalid and of no effect.” | setting aside a no-answer default judgment where the registered agent for service was “Henry Bunting, Jr.” but the return identifies person served as “Henry Bunting” | reversing the entry of a default judgment where the “record” did not reflect strict compliance with the rules of civil procedure relating to the issuance, service, and return of citation | service was on “Henry Bunting while the registered agent named for defendant was “Henry Bunting, Jr.” | petition identified the registered agent for service as “Henry Bunting, Jr.” but the citation and return of service reflected delivery to “Henry Bunting” | failure to show “strict compliance” with service of process rules “renders the attempted service of process invalid and of no effect” | failure to show strict compliance with rules relating to proper service renders any attempted service invalid and requires setting aside a default judgment | there are no presumptions in favor of valid issuance, service, and return of citation in face of writ or error attack on default judgment | failure to show strict