Opinion · Texas Supreme Court
Richards v. Mena
35 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 238
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Texas Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Texas
- Date
- 1991-12-11
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that appeal of a temporary injunction was rendered moot by the rendering of a permanent injunction
- “[T]he district court has now rendered a final judgment in the permanent injunction sought in this cause. Consideration of the temporary injunction is therefore moot.”
- appeal from temporary injunction moot after district court rendered final judgment as to permanent injunction
- appeal of temporary injunction was rendered moot by rendering of permanent injunction
- appeal of temporary injunction rendered moot by rendering of permanent injunction
- final judgment moots an appeal of temporary injunction
- final injunction moots appeal of temporary injunction
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Richards v. Mena. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 30 opinions
ORDER
This cause is a direct appeal of a temporary injunction issued because the district court held the statutory redistricting for the Texas House of Representative was contrary to provisions of the Texas Constitution. The district court has now rendered a final judgment in the permanent injunction sought in this cause. Consideration of the temporary injunction is therefore moot. Coalition of Cities for Affordalbe Utility Rates v. Third Court of Appeals, 787 S.W.2d 946, 947 (Tex.1990). We therefore dismiss this appeal as moot. The dismissal is of this appeal of the temporary injunction order only, and is without prejudice to the appeal, if any, of the final judgment granting or denying any permanent injunction.