Norman Communications v. Texas Eastman Co.

holding that an appellate court’s review of any restricted appeal may include review of the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence | stating that review by restricted appeal affords appellant same scope of review as ordinary appeal, which is review of entire case | stating that review by restricted appeal affords appellant same scope of review as ordinary appeal, which is review of entire case | stating that review by restricted appeal affords appellant same scope of review as ordinary appeal, which is review of entire case | recognizing review of legal and factual sufficiency claims is permissible when a post-answer default judgment is challenged by restricted appeal | holding review on restricted appeal may include legal and factual sufficiency of evidence issues | holding review on restricted appeal may include legal and factual sufficiency of evidence issues | holding review on restricted appeal may include legal and factual sufficiency of evidence issues | holding that restricted-appeal error review includes sufficiency review | stating that review by writ of error affords an appellant the same scope of review as an ordinary appeal, restricted only by the requirement that error appear on the face of the record | defining face of the record as all papers on file in the appeal, including the statement of facts | affirming holding that affidavit attached to appellate brief did not satisfy restricted appeal requirement that error be apparent on face of record | defining face of the record as all papers on file in the appeal, including the statement of facts | defining face of the record as all papers on file in the appeal, including the statement of facts | outlining elements of restricted appeal using former “writ of error” terminology | review of a restricted appeal necessarily includes review of the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence | appellant in restricted appeal may challenge legal sufficiency of evidence to support default judgment | “Review by writ of error affords an appellant the same scope of review as an ordinary appeal, that is, a review of the entire case” | review of a restricted appeal necessarily includes review of the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence | review of a restricted appeal necessarily includes review of the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence | review of a restricted appeal necessarily includes review of the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence | review of a restricted appeal necessarily includes review of the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence | applying four requirements under prior Rule 45 | same, under prior nomenclature of "writ of error" | remanding for review of appellant’s legal sufficiency point | involving a former writ of error review | involving a former writ of error review | applying four requirements under prior Rule 45 | decided under predecessor writ-of-error practice | decided under predecessor writ-of-error practice | setting out writ of error standards | setting out writ of error standards | discussing writ of error procedure | decided under predecessor writ-of-error practice | discussing writ of error procedure | decided under predecessor writ-of-error practice | decided under former, writ-of-error practice | decided under predecessor writ-of-error practice | decided under predecessor writ-of-error practice