Hosner v. DeYoung

holding that the State could not be sued in her own courts absent her consent "and then only in the manner indicated” | holding that the State could not be sued in her own courts absent her consent “and then only in the manner indicated” | holding that State could not be sued in its own courts absent its consent “and then only in the manner indicated” | recognizing as appropriate procedure the challenge of a courts subject matter jurisdiction through a plea to the jurisdiction | recognizing as appropriate procedure the challenge of a courts subject matter jurisdiction through a plea to the jurisdiction | holding "No State can be sued in her own Courts without her consent and then only in a manner indicated by that consent." | holding “No State can be sued in her own Courts without her consent and then only in a manner indicated by that consent.” | recognizing as appropriate procedure the challenge of a court's subject matter jurisdiction through a plea to the jurisdiction | noting that at the time of Hosner, the common-law doctrine was “then more than six centuries old” | holding “No State can be sued in her own Courts without her consent and then only in a manner indicated by that consent.” | holding “No State can be sued in her own Courts without her consent and then only in a manner indicated by that consent.” | recognizing the doctrine after Texas joined the Union | recognizing the doctrine after Texas joined the Union | recognizing as appropriate of trial" | "[N]o state can be sued in her own courts without her consent, and then only in the manner indicated by that consent." | state may be sued “only in the manner, place, and court or courts designated” by legislature | “[N]o state can be sued in her own courts without her consent, and then only in the manner indicated by that consent.” | “[N]o state can be sued in her own courts without her consent, and then only in the manner indicated by that consent.” | “[N]o state can be sued in her own courts without her consent, and then only in the manner indicated by that consent.” | state may be sued "only in the manner, place, and court or courts designated" by legislature | A Even if a statutory requirement is mandatory, this does not mean that compliance is necessarily jurisdictional. @ | “A state - 18 - cannot be sued in her own courts without her own consent, and then only in the manner indicated by that consent” | "[M]andamus is not a process that can be resorted to against the state without its consent, and ... no state can be sued in her own courts without her consent, and then only in the manner indicated by that consent." | “[M]andamus is not a process that can be resorted to against the state without its consent, and . . . no state can be sued in her own courts without her consent, and then only in the manner indicated by that consent.” | entitled "Waiver of Governmental Immunity; Permission to Sue” | “[N]o state can be sued in her own courts without her      !  " #$%& ' Appx. Page 383 of 740          !"# $%&'$'"(       consent[.]” | “[N]o state can be sued in her own courts without her      !  " #$%& ' Appx. Page 143 of 740          !"# $%&'$'"(       consent[.]”