Opinion · Tennessee Supreme Court

Overholser v. Clark

1 Thompson 49

Type
Opinion
Court
Tennessee Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Tennessee
Date
1850-09-15
Topic
general

McKinney, J., delivered an oral opinion, in which it was held, on the authority of Bettis v. Mansfield, 11 Humph. 604, that the rule expired at the term at which,' by its terms, the plaintiff was to comply with it. If the defendant fails to dispose of it in some way at that term, he cannot do it afterwards ; and this whether the Court is held or not. [1] The judgment of the Circuit Court was reversed, and the cause remanded. (1) Irvins v. Mathis, 11 Humph. 603; Sharp v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Overholser v. Clark. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
66 opinions
McKinney, J.,

delivered an oral opinion, in which it was held, on the authority of Bettis v. Mansfield, 11 Humph. 604, that the rule expired at the term at which,' by its terms, the plaintiff was to comply with it. If the defendant fails to dispose of it in some way at that term, he cannot do it afterwards ; and this whether the Court is held or not. [1]

The judgment of the Circuit Court was reversed, and the cause remanded.

(1) Irvins v. Mathis, 11 Humph. 603; Sharp v. Miller, 3 Sneed, 42; Bettis v. Mansfield, 11 Humph. 604.