Opinion · Tennessee Supreme Court

Hurst v. Selvidge

Hurst v. Selvidge, 1 Thompson 17 (Tenn. 1847)

Type
Opinion
Court
Tennessee Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Tennessee
Date
1847-09-15
Topic
general

By the COURT: After the continuance of the cause no rules or proceedings could be had in it until the succeeding term.* Judgment reversed, and cause remanded. A general continuance of all causes at the end of the Term -will prevent a discontinuance, without an entry of continuance in each particular case. Peck, J., in Johnson v. Ditty, 7 Yerg. 85-87. But see King of Spain v.

Citator

Cited by
39 opinions
By the COURT:

After the continuance of the cause no rules or proceedings could be had in it until the succeeding term.*

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

A general continuance of all causes at the end of the Term -will prevent a discontinuance, without an entry of continuance in each particular case. Peck, J., in Johnson v. Ditty, 7 Yerg. 85-87. But see King of Spain v. Oliver, Pet. C. C. 217, where it was held that the continuance of a cause by consent does not discharge a rule for trial or non pros.