Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Zoning Board of Adjustment v. DeBlasio

516 U.S. 937

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1995-10-16
Topic
labor-and-employment

How later courts describe this case

  • concluding that "[n]o 'new evidence' resulted from the jurors' use of a magnifying glass to examine ... fingerprint cards and [a] gun"
  • “[e]ven where the right to self-representation is clearly invoked, it must be done so in a timely manner, and courts will balance any such assertion against considerations of judicial delay”
  • allegations of partisan political purposes for a zoning decision state a claim
  • "[W]hen a state affords a full judicial mechanism with which to challenge the administrative decision in question, the state provides adequate procedural due process, ... whether or not the plaintiff avails himself or herself of the provided appeal mechanism."

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Zoning Board of Adjustment v. DeBlasio. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
56 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of New Jersey State League of Municipalities for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.