Zimmerman v. Washington Department of Social and Health Services

holding that an officer may rely upon information received through an informant “ ‘so long as the informant’s statement is reasonably corroborated by other matters within the officer’s knowledge’ ” | holding that an officer may rely upon information received through an informant " `so long as the informant's statement is reasonably corroborated by other matters within the officer's knowledge' " | “We review the [suppression] court’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the State, pursuant to a clear error standard, but we review the legal conclusions de novo” | "We review the [suppression] court's factual findings in the light most favorable to the State, pursuant to a clear error standard, but we review the legal conclusions de novo" | prosecution made ill-advised remark when he argued that appellant offered no expert testimony to refute the state’s expert witness, but remark not so flagrant as to require reversal