WVCH Communications, Inc. v. Upper Providence Township

expressly overruling the "catalyst" theory and stating that a plaintiff may only qualify as a "prevailing party" by virtue of "having obtained an enforceable judgment, consent decree, or settlement giving some of the legal relief sought" | expressly overruling the “catalyst” theory and stating that a plaintiff may only qualify as a "prevailing party” by virtue of "having obtained an enforceable judgment, consent decree, or settlement giving some of the legal relief sought” | expressly overruling the “catalyst” theory and stating that a plaintiff may only qualify as a “prevailing party” by virtue of “having obtained an enforceable judgment, consent decree, or settlement giving some of the legal relief sought”