Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Worrell v. B. F. Goodrich Co.

Worrell v. B. F. Goodrich Co., 454 U.S. 969 (1981)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1981-11-02
Topic
general

evidence of violation of affirmative action program and failure to support the affirmative action director is relevant to discern attitude towards, race | “Evidence, such as Teletype’s failure to live up to its affirmative action program and its failure to support its affirmative action director, is also relevant to discerning the Company’s attitude regarding race.” | Burdine does not affect a case of classwide discrimination where the evidence exposes the employer as "a proven wrongdoer" and creates a presumption--"unless the employer proves otherwise--that any class member was a victim of that policy" | “That there are other, arguably more advanced, methods in use by the defendant ... is of no significance where the method in use by [the employee] was not an inherently unsafe one.” | Burdine does not affect a case of classwide discrimination where the evidence exposes the employer as “a proven wrongdoer” and creates a presumption — “unless the employer proves otherwise — that any class member was a victim of that policy” | defining a continuing violation as “standard operating procedure” | relevant evidence re prima facie case

Citator

Cited by
51 opinions

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.