Winters v. Bohanon

noting that, in light of the many Supreme Court decisions defining and applying the term "investment contract," an argument that the term is impermissibly vague is untenable | “investment contract” not void for vagueness “[i]n light of the many Supreme Court decisions defining and applying the term” | “[ujnder the 1970 amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3500, the defendant has no right to pre-trial discovery of statements made by government witnesses to the grand jury” (footnote omitted | agency “must be free without undue interference or delay to conduct an investigation which will adequately develop a factual basis for a determination as to whether particular activities come within the [agency’s] regulatory authority” | cocaine held to be a “narcotic drug” under previous statute | issuance of allegedly harmful press releases